
COMP4501 is a 2 unit honours level course which focuses on the specialised areas of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The course takes a research oriented approach to providing students with the specialised knowledge as it explores emerging issues in HCI.
Friday 2-4 pm
| GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE | LEARNING OBJECTIVES |
| A. IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIELD OF STUDY | |
| A1. A comprehensive and well-founded knowledge in the field of study. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| A4. An understanding of how other disciplines relate to the field of study. | 2 |
| A5. An international perspective on the field of study. | 1, 3, 4 |
| B. EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION | |
| B1. The ability to collect, analyse and organise information and ideas and to convey those ideas clearly and fluently, in both written and spoken forms. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
| B2. The ability to interact effectively with others in order to work towards a common outcome. | 5 |
| B3. The ability to select and use the appropriate level, style and means of communication. | 4, 5, 6 |
| B4. The ability to engage effectively and appropriately with information and communication technologies. | 4, 6 |
| C. INDEPENDENCE AND CREATIVITY | |
| C1. The ability to work and learn independently. | 1, 4, 6, 7 |
| C3. The ability to generate ideas and adapt innovatively to changing environments. | 6, 7 |
| C4. The ability to identify problems, create solutions, innovate and improve current practices. | 7 |
| D. CRITICAL JUDGEMENT | |
| D1. The ability to define and analyse problems. | 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 |
| D2. The ability to apply critical reasoning to issues through independent thought and informed judgement. | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| D3. The ability to evaluate opinions, make decisions and to reflect critically on the justifications for decisions. | 2, 4, 7 |
| E. ETHICAL AND SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING | |
| E1. An understanding of social and civic responsibility. | |
| E2. An appreciation of the philosophical and social contexts of a discipline. | 1, 2, 3, 7 |
| E4. A knowledge and respect of ethics and ethical standards in relation to a major area of study. | 7 |
| E5. A knowledge of other cultures and times and an appreciation of cultural diversity. | |
| GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE | LEARNING OBJECTIVES |
| 1. Ability to apply knowledge of basic science and engineering fundamentals | 2, 7 |
| 2. Ability to communicate effectively, not only with engineers, but also with the community at large | 4 |
| 3. In-depth technical competence in at least one engineering discipline | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 |
| 4. Ability to undertake problem identification, formulation and solution | 4, 7 |
| 5. Ability to utilise a systems approach to design and operational performance | |
| 6. Ability to function effectively as an individual and in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams, with the capacity to be a team leader or manager as well as an effective team member | |
| 7. Understanding of the social, cultural, global and environmental responsibilities of the professional engineer, and for the need for sustainable development | 2 |
| 8. Understanding of the principles of sustainable design and development | |
| 9. Understanding of and commitment to professional and ethical responsibilities | |
| 10. Expectation and capacity to undertake life-long learning | 3 |
| There is no required text book for COMP4501. | |
| For this course, students are required to read a number of book chapters, journal papers and conference papers. A reading list will be provided at the commencement of the course. | |
The course web site is available at http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~comp4501. The course web site will contain:
|
|
| The course newsgroup is uq.itee.comp4501. This group is available on both the University and School news servers (news.uq.edu.au and news.itee.uq.edu.au). Students are free to post questions (and answers!) to the newsgroup. Copies of announcements will also be posted to the newsgroup. The teaching staff will monitor the newsgroup. |
|
Outside the weekly lecture contact, the lecturer or nominee will provide students with guidance on project management, provide information on additional resources and readings that may support the project work and offer feedback on work completed to date. |
|
| Students will find the ACM digital library and IEEE Xplore digital library invaluable resources for this course. These digital libraries are available through the UQ Library Databases system http://www.library.uq.edu.au/database/index.php |
||
| Benyon, D., Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2005). Designing of Interactive Systems: People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies, New York: Addison Wesley (call number: QA76.9.H85 B45 2005 ) | ||
|
||
The learning environment for COMP4501 utilises a strong focus towards student-centred learning, involving group discussions and project presentations.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
0% - 19%
20% - 44%
45% - 49%
50% - 64%
65% - 74%
75% - 84%
85% - 100%
Final grade (on a 1 to 7 scale) will be determined by combining the marks from the various assessment components as described in Section 5.1 above.
Your final mark will be calculated from your marks for the assessment throughout the semester.
Student teams are required to present and discuss project progress at the lecture session as directed by the lecturer. Teams will need to present an overview of work completed as well as a plan for the coming week. Team cohesion will also be evaluated. The lecturer and peers will provide support and feedback as necessary.
Tasks required during this period
Note that the literature review is due end of week 5.
For the weeks that project is discussed, each member of the team will be graded on both process (2%) and team cohesion (1%) per presentation.
Process knowledge will be graded against
Team cohesiveness will be graded on demonstrated efforts towards productive teams eg. weekly contract (virtual or face to face) and team cooperation.
Students will be required to guide the weekly reading discussion sessions. Each student is required to manage one discussion session. Students are required to provide a 10 minute summary of the readings for that session. They should then guide the discussion process, drawing out relevant and interesting discussion points, initiating debate on areas of contention, moderating opinions and capturing important revelations.
Preparing for and attending most weekly discussions is a prerequisite for this assessment item
Students will be assessed on:
Marksheets are able on the course website.
Each student group must write a literature review which clearly relates to their selected project topic. This literature review should present a review of relevant background material and an assessment of the impact of previous work on the current project. All background and related material should be appropriately referenced and appear in a bibliography.
Each case study discussed in the literature review is to be defined in terms of the PACT framework. From this, the conclusion of the literature review will address the project development in terms of PACT.
Group Assessment
Each student group is required to prepare and present a 30-minute seminar which describes their project aims, the work completed and the project outcomes.
Group Assessment
Each student in the presentation team will be graded on his/her presentation style, the seminar structure and content.
Presentation marks (4%) will be awarded based on the following criteria:
Structure marks (4%) will be awarded based on the following criteria:
Content marks (4%) will be awarded based on the following criteria:
Teams will get up to 3 marks for a professional presentation.
Refection [Individual Assessment]: Each student is also required to write a three page reflective essay which critically examines the HCI ideas and concepts examined throughout the semester. The student is required to reflect on their acquired knowledge in relation to the project they have completed and determine what worked well and areas for improvement. The student should critically evaluate the outcomes of the project to determine the extent to which project goals were achieved.(15%)
An overview of the University’s assessment-related policies can be found on myAdvisor (http://www.uq.edu.au/myadvisor/index.html?page=2910).
Academic Integrity
It is the University's task to encourage ethical scholarship and to inform students and staff about the institutional standards of academic behaviour expected of them in learning, teaching and research. Students have a responsibility to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity in their work. Students must not cheat in examinations or other forms of assessment and must ensure they do not plagiarise.
Plagiarism
The University has adopted the following definition of plagiarism:
Plagiarism is the act of misrepresenting as one's own original work the ideas, interpretations, words or creative works of another. These include published and unpublished documents, designs, music, sounds, images, photographs, computer codes and ideas gained through working in a group. These ideas, interpretations, words or works may be found in print and/or electronic media.
Students are encouraged to read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism policy (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25128) which makes a comprehensive statement about the University's approach to plagiarism, including the approved use of plagiarism detection software, the consequences of plagiarism and the principles associated with preventing plagiarism.
As a student you have a responsibility to incorporate feedback into your learning; make use of the assessment criteria that you are given; be aware of the rules, policies and other documents related to assessment; and provide teachers with feedback on their assessment practices.
There are certain steps you can take if you feel your result does not reflect your performance. Please refer to the myAdvisor web site. (http://www.uq.edu.au/myadvisor/index.html?page=2953)Further to the statement on academic integrity and plagiarism above, students are required to read and understand the ITEE policy on Student Misconduct (http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/about_ITEE/policies/student-misconduct.html).
The policy and procedure for late arrival or non-attendance at centrally controlled and school-based examinations is set out in the University's Assessment policy (HUPP 3.30.1), section 4.8 at http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25109.
Where an adjustment is made to an accredited program, it is the responsibility of the relevant Faculty to liaise with professional and registration bodies regarding the acceptability of the change/s.
Below is a table showing the relationship between the learning objectives for this course and the broader graduate attributes developed, the learning activities used to develop each objective and the assessment task used to assess each objective.
| Learning Objectives | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Learning Activities | |||||||
| Semester-long project (Project) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Project Updates (Discussion) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Reading (Discussion) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Seminar Presentations (Seminar) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Assessment Tasks | |||||||
| Project Progress Updates |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| Lead Discussion of a HCI Reading |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Project Literature Review |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| Project Seminar |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Final Project Report |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Learning Objectives | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Graduate Attributes | |||||||
| A IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIELD OF STUDY | |||||||
| A1. A comprehensive and well-founded knowledge in the field of study. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| A4. An understanding of how other disciplines relate to the field of study. |
![]() |
||||||
| A5. An international perspective on the field of study. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| B EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION | |||||||
| B1. The ability to collect, analyse and organise information and ideas and to convey those ideas clearly and fluently, in both written and spoken forms. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| B2. The ability to interact effectively with others in order to work towards a common outcome. |
![]() |
||||||
| B3. The ability to select and use the appropriate level, style and means of communication. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| B4. The ability to engage effectively and appropriately with information and communication technologies. |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| C INDEPENDENCE AND CREATIVITY | |||||||
| C1. The ability to work and learn independently. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| C3. The ability to generate ideas and adapt innovatively to changing environments. |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| C4. The ability to identify problems, create solutions, innovate and improve current practices. |
![]() |
||||||
| D CRITICAL JUDGEMENT | |||||||
| D1. The ability to define and analyse problems. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| D2. The ability to apply critical reasoning to issues through independent thought and informed judgement. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| D3. The ability to evaluate opinions, make decisions and to reflect critically on the justifications for decisions. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| E ETHICAL AND SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING | |||||||
| E1. An understanding of social and civic responsibility. | |||||||
| E2. An appreciation of the philosophical and social contexts of a discipline. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| E4. A knowledge and respect of ethics and ethical standards in relation to a major area of study. |
![]() |
||||||
| E5. A knowledge of other cultures and times and an appreciation of cultural diversity. | |||||||
| Learning Objectives | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Graduate Attributes | |||||||
| 1. Ability to apply knowledge of basic science and engineering fundamentals |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| 2. Ability to communicate effectively, not only with engineers, but also with the community at large |
![]() |
||||||
| 3. In-depth technical competence in at least one engineering discipline |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| 4. Ability to undertake problem identification, formulation and solution |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| 5. Ability to utilise a systems approach to design and operational performance | |||||||
| 6. Ability to function effectively as an individual and in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams, with the capacity to be a team leader or manager as well as an effective team member | |||||||
| 7. Understanding of the social, cultural, global and environmental responsibilities of the professional engineer, and for the need for sustainable development |
![]() |
||||||
| 8. Understanding of the principles of sustainable design and development | |||||||
| 9. Understanding of and commitment to professional and ethical responsibilities | |||||||
| 10. Expectation and capacity to undertake life-long learning |
![]() |
||||||
| feedback |
|
Authorised by: Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic) Maintained by: Software Services Last Updated - 24 May , 2006 |