
COMP4501 is a 2 unit honours level course which focuses on the specialised areas of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The course takes a research oriented approach to providing students with the specialised knowledge as it explores emerging issues in HCI.
Friday 2-4 pm
| GRADUATE ATTRIBUTE | LEARNING OBJECTIVES |
| A. IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIELD OF STUDY | |
| A2. A broad understanding of the field of study, including how other disciplines relate to the field of study. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| A3. A comprehensive and in-depth knowledge in the field of study. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
| A5. An international perspective on the field of study. | 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
| A7. An appreciation of the link between theory and practice. | 1, 6, 7 |
| B. EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION | |
| B1. The ability to collect, analyse and organise information and ideas and to convey those ideas clearly and fluently, in both written and spoken forms. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| B2. The ability to interact effectively with others in order to work towards a common outcome. | 5 |
| B3. The ability to select and use the appropriate level, style and means of communication. | 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| B4. The ability to engage effectively and appropriately with information and communication technologies. | 4, 6, 7 |
| B5. The ability to practise as part of an interdisciplinary team. | 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| C. INDEPENDENCE AND CREATIVITY | |
| C2. The ability to work and learn independently and effectively. | 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 |
| C3. The ability to generate ideas and adapt innovatively to changing environments. | 2, 6, 7 |
| C5. The ability to formulate and investigate problems, create solutions, innovate and improve current practices. | 2, 5, 6, 7 |
| C6. The abilities and skills that provide a foundation for future leadership roles. | 4, 5, 7 |
| D. CRITICAL JUDGEMENT | |
| D2. The ability to apply critical reasoning to issues through independent thought and informed judgement. | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| D4. The ability to process material and to critically analyse and integrate information from a wide range of sources. | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| D5. The ability to evaluate opinions, make decisions and to reflect critically on the justifications for decisions using an evidence-based approach. | 2, 6, 7 |
| E. ETHICAL AND SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING | |
| E1. An understanding of social and civic responsibility. | 2 |
| E3. An appreciation of the philosophical and social contexts of a discipline. | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 |
| E4. A knowledge and respect of ethics and ethical standards in relation to a major area of study. | 4, 7 |
| E5. A knowledge of other cultures and times and an appreciation of cultural diversity. | |
| E7. The ability to work effectively and sensitively across all areas of society. | 2 |
| E8. An understanding of and respect for the roles and expertise of associated disciplines. | 2, 3, 4 |
| There is no required text book for COMP4501. | |
| For this course, students are required to read a number of book chapters, journal papers and conference papers. A reading list will be provided at the commencement of the course. | |
The course web site is available at http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~comp4501. The course web site will contain:
|
|
| The course newsgroup is uq.itee.comp4501. This group is available on both the University and School news servers (news.uq.edu.au and news.itee.uq.edu.au). Students are free to post questions (and answers!) to the newsgroup. Copies of announcements will also be posted to the newsgroup. The teaching staff will monitor the newsgroup. |
|
Learning within COMP4501 is largely self-directed and involves weekly group discussions (weeks 2-6) , project meetings (weeks 7-11) and project presentations in week 12.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0% - 19%
20% - 44%
45% - 49%
50% - 64%
65% - 74%
75% - 84%
85% - 100%
Final grade (on a 1 to 7 scale) will be determined by combining the marks from the various assessment components as described in Section 5.1 above.
Your final mark will be calculated from your marks for the assessment throughout the semester.
Students will be required to guide the weekly reading discussion sessions. Each student is required to manage one discussion session. Students are required to provide a 10 minute summary of the readings for that session. They should then guide the discussion process, drawing out relevant and interesting discussion points, initiating debate on areas of contention, moderating opinions and capturing important revelations.
Preparing for and attending most weekly discussions is a prerequisite for this assessment item
Students will be assessed on:
From week 7 to week 11, student teams are required to present and discuss project progress at the lecture session. Teams will need to present an overview of work completed as well as a plan for the coming week. Team cohesion will also be evaluated. The lecturer and peers will provide support and feedback as necessary.
Each member of the team will be graded on both process (1%) and team cohesion (1%) per weekly presentation.
Process knowledge will be graded against
Team cohesiveness will be graded on demonstrated efforts towards productive teams eg. weekly contract (virtual or face to face) and team cooperation.
Each student group must write a literature review which clearly relates to their selected project topic. This literature review should present a review of relevant background material and an assessment of the impact of previous work on the current project. All background and related material should be appropriately referenced and appear in a bibliography.
Group Assessment
Each student group is required to prepare and present a 15-minute seminar which describes their project aims, the work completed and the project outcomes.
Group Assessment
Students will be graded on their presentation style, the seminar structure and content.
Presentation marks (5%) will be awarded based on the following criteria:
Structure marks (5%) will be awarded based on the following criteria:
Content marks (5%) will be awarded based on the following criteria:
Refection [Individual Assessment]: Each student is also required to write a three page reflective essay which critically examines the HCI ideas and concepts examined throughout the semester. The student is required to reflect on their acquired knowledge in relation to the project they have completed and determine what worked well and areas for improvement. The student should critically evaluate the outcomes of the project to determine the extent to which project goals were achieved.
The project report will be marked against the following criteria:
An overview of the University’s assessment-related policies can be found on myAdvisor (http://www.uq.edu.au/myadvisor/index.html?page=2910).
Academic Integrity
It is the University's task to encourage ethical scholarship and to inform students and staff about the institutional standards of academic behaviour expected of them in learning, teaching and research. Students have a responsibility to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity in their work. Students must not cheat in examinations or other forms of assessment and must ensure they do not plagiarise.
Plagiarism
The University has adopted the following definition of plagiarism:
Plagiarism is the act of misrepresenting as one's own original work the ideas, interpretations, words or creative works of another. These include published and unpublished documents, designs, music, sounds, images, photographs, computer codes and ideas gained through working in a group. These ideas, interpretations, words or works may be found in print and/or electronic media.
Students are encouraged to read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism policy (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25128) which makes a comprehensive statement about the University's approach to plagiarism, including the approved use of plagiarism detection software, the consequences of plagiarism and the principles associated with preventing plagiarism.
As a student you have a responsibility to incorporate feedback into your learning; make use of the assessment criteria that you are given; be aware of the rules, policies and other documents related to assessment; and provide teachers with feedback on their assessment practices.
There are certain steps you can take if you feel your result does not reflect your performance. Please refer to the myAdvisor web site. (http://www.uq.edu.au/myadvisor/index.html?page=2953)Further to the statement on academic integrity and plagiarism above, students are required to read and understand the ITEE policy on Student Misconduct (http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/about_ITEE/policies/student-misconduct.html).
Late Arrival or Non-attendance at Examinations
The policy and procedure for late arrival or non-attendance at centrally controlled examinations is set out in the University's Examinations policy (HUPP 3.30.5), sections 8 and 10.2.
The way in which late arrival at a School-controlled examination is dealt with will be at the discretion of the course coordinator, who may be guided by the policy for centrally controlled exams.
In the case that a student requests a special exam for a School-controlled exam, the request will be considered and, if allowed, the timing shall be determined by the course coordinator, in consultation with the School's Chief Examiner where necessary, and in accordance with HUPP 3.30.5. Unless otherwise indicated in the Course Profile, applications must be made in writing to the Head of School no later than one week after the exam. Late applications will not be accepted.
Where an adjustment is made to an accredited program, it is the responsibility of the relevant Faculty to liaise with professional and registration bodies regarding the acceptability of the change/s.
Below is a table showing the relationship between the learning objectives for this course and the broader graduate attributes developed, the learning activities used to develop each objective and the assessment task used to assess each objective.
| Learning Objectives | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Learning Activities | |||||||
| Semester-long project (Project) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Group Forums (Discussion) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Weekly Project Discussions (Other) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| Seminar Presentations (Seminar) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Assessment Tasks | |||||||
| Lead Discussion of a HCI Reading |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Weekly Project Reports |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| Project Literature Review |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| Project Seminar |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Final Project Report |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Teamwork - Virtual and face-to-face interaction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Learning Objectives | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Graduate Attributes | |||||||
| A IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIELD OF STUDY | |||||||
| A2. A broad understanding of the field of study, including how other disciplines relate to the field of study. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| A3. A comprehensive and in-depth knowledge in the field of study. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| A5. An international perspective on the field of study. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| A7. An appreciation of the link between theory and practice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| B EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION | |||||||
| B1. The ability to collect, analyse and organise information and ideas and to convey those ideas clearly and fluently, in both written and spoken forms. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| B2. The ability to interact effectively with others in order to work towards a common outcome. |
![]() |
||||||
| B3. The ability to select and use the appropriate level, style and means of communication. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| B4. The ability to engage effectively and appropriately with information and communication technologies. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| B5. The ability to practise as part of an interdisciplinary team. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| C INDEPENDENCE AND CREATIVITY | |||||||
| C2. The ability to work and learn independently and effectively. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| C3. The ability to generate ideas and adapt innovatively to changing environments. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| C5. The ability to formulate and investigate problems, create solutions, innovate and improve current practices. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| C6. The abilities and skills that provide a foundation for future leadership roles. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| D CRITICAL JUDGEMENT | |||||||
| D2. The ability to apply critical reasoning to issues through independent thought and informed judgement. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| D4. The ability to process material and to critically analyse and integrate information from a wide range of sources. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| D5. The ability to evaluate opinions, make decisions and to reflect critically on the justifications for decisions using an evidence-based approach. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| E ETHICAL AND SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING | |||||||
| E1. An understanding of social and civic responsibility. | |||||||