Grade 1, Fail: Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course:
Final mark of 19 or lower.
Grade 2, Fail: Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline:
Final mark of 20-44.
Grade 3, Fail: Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline:
Final mark of 45-49
(final mark is calculated using exam+assignment+participation with a capping based on Assignment 2 mark and exam - see below)
Grade 4, Pass: Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline:
FInal mark of 50-64
(final mark is calculated using exam+assignment+participation with a capping based on Assignment 2 mark and exam - see below)
Grade 5, Credit: Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline:
Final mark of 64-74
(final mark is calculated using exam+assignment+participation with a capping based on Assignment 2 mark and exam - see below)
Grade 6, Distinction: As for 5, with frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience:
Final mark of 75-84
(final mark is calculated using exam+assignment+participation with a capping based on Assignment 2 mark and exam - see below)
Grade 7, High Distinction: As for 6, with consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications:
Final mark of 85 or higher
final mark is calculated using exam+assignment+participation with a capping based on Assignment 2 mark and exam - see below)
Other Requirements & Comments : The final mark will be calculated using the following table.
|
Assignment 2 and Exam
|
Final mark Exam (30%), Assignments (60%), Participation (10%)
|
|
50% or better in the Exam and 50% or better in Assignment 2
|
Exam+assignments+participation
|
|
Less than 50% in one or both of the Exam and Assignment 2.
|
Exam+assignments+participation capped at 49
|
Note that the above table means that you must pass both Assignment 2 and the Exam to pass the course.
Participation
Type: Participation in Lectures and Tutorials
Learning Objectives Assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Due Date:
Starts week 1
Weight: 10%
Task Description: Attendance and participation in lectures and tutorials will be assessed.
Criteria & Marking: 1 mark will be given for each lecture and tutorial in which the student actively participates through discussion, and asking or answering questions.
Total number of marks will be normalised by the number of assessable sessions.
Assignment 1. Review a simulation tool
Type: Assignments
Learning Objectives Assessed: 1, 4
Due Date:
Details available in Week 1
Weight: 10%
Task Description: The first assignment aims to develop understanding of the software tools available via a detailed investigation of the strengths and weaknesses of one simulation package and listening to presentations about other packages.
Task: Investigate a software package useful for agent-based or mathematical modelling of complex systems; produce a short report in html format (1000 words) and present a 15 minute talk (including a demonstration). See the assignment specification for more details.
The assignment specification will be available from the course web page in week 1.
Criteria & Marking: Will be available with the Assignment spec in week 1.
Submission: via the online submission system
Assignment 2. Model a complex system
Type: Assignments
Learning Objectives Assessed: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6
Due Date:
Details available in Week 1
Weight: 50%
Task Description: The second assignment is aimed at developing research skills in complex systems analysis or applying tools to a complex problem and gaining experience in practical applications through ones own as well as class discussions of other projects. See the assignment specification for more details and a detailed breakdown of the marks assigned to stages of the project.
The assignment specification will be available from the course web page in week 1.
Criteria & Marking: Will be available in week 1.
Submission: Via the online submission system
Final exam
Type: Exam - during Exam Period (School)
Learning Objectives Assessed: 1, 2, 6
Due Date:
Examination Period
Weight: 30%
Perusal: 10 minutes
Duration: 120 minutes
Task Description: A two hour examination will be held during the final examination period. This exam will be closed-book and will contain both short-answer and essay questions. You may bring a battery-operated non-programmable calculator. Programmable calculators and other computing or communication devices are NOT permitted. Multiple choice questions may be included. You will require a HB or 2B pencil and an eraser to complete the exam.
Criteria & Marking: The exam will be marked by the lecturers.
6. Policies & Guidelines
6.1 Assessment Related Policies and Guidelines
University Policies & Guidelines
An overview of the University’s assessment-related policies can be found on myAdvisor (http://www.uq.edu.au/myadvisor/index.html?page=2910). Students should refer to section 3.30 Assessment in the University Handbook of Policies and Procedures (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25108) for full details on all assessment-related policies.
Academic Integrity & Plagiarism
It is the University's task to encourage ethical scholarship and to inform students and staff about the institutional standards of academic behaviour expected of them in learning, teaching and research. Students have a responsibility to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity in their work. Students must not cheat in examinations or other forms of assessment and must ensure they do not plagiarise.
The University has adopted the following definition of plagiarism:
Plagiarism is the act of misrepresenting as one's own original work the ideas, interpretations, words or creative works of another. These include published and unpublished documents, designs, music, sounds, images, photographs, computer codes and ideas gained through working in a group. These ideas, interpretations, words or works may be found in print and/or electronic media.
The following are examples of plagiarism where appropriate acknowledgement or referencing of the author or source does not occur:
- Direct copying of paragraphs, sentences, a single sentence or significant parts of a sentence;
- Direct copying of paragraphs, sentences, a single sentence or significant parts of a sentence with an end reference but without quotation marks around the copied text;
- Copying ideas, concepts, research results, computer codes, statistical tables, designs, images, sounds or text or any combination of these;
- Paraphrasing, summarising or simply rearranging another person's words, ideas, etc without changing the basic structure and/or meaning of the text;
- Offering an idea or interpretation that is not one's own without identifying whose idea or interpretation it is;
- A 'cut and paste' of statements from multiple sources;
- Presenting as independent, work done in collaboration with others;
- Copying or adapting another student's original work into a submitted assessment item.
You are encouraged to read the UQ Academic Integrity and Plagiarism policy (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25128) which makes a comprehensive statement about the University's approach to plagiarism, including the approved use of plagiarism detection software, the consequences of plagiarism and the principles associated with preventing plagiarism.
Feedback on Assessment
Feedback is essential to effective learning and students can expect to receive appropriate and timely feedback on all assessment.
For a detailed explanation of the feedback you are entitled to, you should consult the policy on Student Access to Feedback on Assessment. (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25114)
As a student you have a responsibility to incorporate feedback into your learning; make use of the assessment criteria that you are given; be aware of the rules, policies and other documents related to assessment; and provide teachers with feedback on their assessment practices.
There are certain steps you can take if you feel your result does not reflect your performance. Please refer to the myAdvisor web site (http://www.uq.edu.au/myadvisor/index.html?page=2953).
School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering Assessment Guidelines
Misconduct
Further to the statement on academic integrity and plagiarism above, students are required to read and understand the ITEE policy on Student Misconduct (http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/about_ITEE/policies/student-misconduct.html).
Late Arrival or Non-attendance at Examinations
The policy and procedure for late arrival or non-attendance at centrally controlled examinations is set out in the University's Examinations policy (HUPP 3.30.5), sections 8 and 10.2.
The way in which late arrival at a School-controlled examination is dealt with will be at the discretion of the course coordinator, who may be guided by the policy for centrally controlled exams.
In the case that a student requests a special exam for a School-controlled exam, the request will be considered and, if allowed, the timing shall be determined by the course coordinator, in consultation with the School's Chief Examiner where necessary, and in accordance with HUPP 3.30.5. Unless otherwise indicated in the Course Profile, applications must be made in writing to the Head of School no later than one week after the exam. Late applications will not be accepted.
Examination Feedback
In addition to the advice above, students wishing to view examination answer scripts and/or question papers should consult with the School office (Room 217, General Purpose South Building [78], St Lucia; Room 218, Building 1, Ipswich) regarding arrangements. The ITEE policy on exam script viewing is available at http://study.itee.uq.edu.au/current_students/exam_script_viewing.html.
Supplementary Assessment
If you fail this course you may be eligible for supplementary assessment - see the general award rules and/or your program rules for details. You should note that even though you may be eligible for supplementary assessment under these rules, in some circumstances there may be no practical assessment that can be offered to allow you to meet the minimum passing requirements. These circumstances may include failure based on:
- group or team based assessment;
- attendance or class participation requirements;
- laboratory-based assessment, where laboratories can't practically be made available after classes have finished;
- project or thesis-based assessment, where a significant period of time would be required to undertake supplementary assessment;
- progressive assessment, where subsequent assessment items build on earlier assessment items; or
- multiple assessment items, where it is impractical to offer multiple supplementary assessment items.
If the course coordinator determines that there is no practical supplementary assessment that can be offered to allow you to improve your grade, then you will not be offered supplementary assessment and your grade will remain unchanged.
6.2 Other Policies and Guidelines
University Policies and Guidelines
Placement Courses
Students on a placement course – also known as a work placement, internship, industry study, industry experience, clinical practice, clinical placement, practical work, practicum, fieldwork, teaching practice – should refer to the University policy, Placement Courses (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25120) for detailed information.
Working with Children
Students whose studies include a professional/work placement, internship, clinical practice, teaching practice or other similar activity which involves them in regular contact with children should refer to the University policy, Working with Children Check - "blue card" (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25004) to find out how to apply for a 'blue card'.
Students with a Disability
Any student with a disability who may require alternative academic arrangements, including assessment, in the course/program is encouraged to seek advice at the commencement of the semester from a Disability Adviser at Student Support Services. Refer to the University policy, Students with a Disability (Disability Action Plan) (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25122) and to the policy on Special Arrangements for Examinations for Students with a Disability (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25111)
Where an adjustment is made to an accredited program, it is the responsibility of the relevant Faculty to liaise with professional and registration bodies regarding the acceptability of the change/s.
Occupational Health and Safety
Undergraduate Students (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25055) and Postgraduate Students (http://www.uq.edu.au/hupp/index.html?page=25057) should be familiar with the University policies on occupational health and safety in the laboratory.
Other School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering Guidelines
Learning Summary
Below is a table showing the relationship between the learning objectives for this course and the
broader graduate attributes developed, the learning activities used to develop each objective and
the assessment task used to assess each objective.
Learning Objectives
After successfully completing this course you should be able to:
1 What: Understanding of key terms, prototypic models and simulation methods. How: Discussion in lectures and tutorials and hands-on experience with modelling packages.
2 What: Understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of complex systems research. How: Attendance at guest lectures by researchers in other disciplines related to complex systems
3 What: Skills in collecting, analysing and reporting research results. How: Preparation of a full report on the conduct and results of the major project.
4 What: Skills with the use of software for computer simulation and modelling. How: Independent work and tutorial sessions on appropriate software
5 What: Capacity for independent research and the ability to generate ideas and adapt innovatively to changing environments. How: Conduct of a major research project in complex systems modelling.
6 What: Ability to generate and assess a research project. How: Preparations and conduct of research and analysis of results as part of major project.
Assessment & Learning Activities
| |
Learning Objectives |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Learning Activities |
| Lectures (Lecture Series) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lab sessions (Tutorial Series) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assessment Tasks |
| Participation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assignment 1. Review a simulation tool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assignment 2. Model a complex system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Final exam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graduate Attributes
Successfully completing this course will contribute to the recognition of your attainment of the following UQ (Postgrad Coursework) graduate attributes:
| |
Learning Objectives |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Graduate Attributes |
| A IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIELD OF STUDY |
| A2. A broad understanding of the field of study, including how other disciplines relate to the field of study. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A3. A comprehensive and in-depth knowledge in the field of study. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A5. An international perspective on the field of study. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION |
| B1. The ability to collect, analyse and organise information and ideas and to convey those ideas clearly and fluently, in both written and spoken forms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B2. The ability to interact effectively with others in order to work towards a common outcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B3. The ability to select and use the appropriate level, style and means of communication. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B4. The ability to engage effectively and appropriately with information and communication technologies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B5. The ability to practise as part of an interdisciplinary team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C INDEPENDENCE AND CREATIVITY |
| C2. The ability to work and learn independently and effectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C3. The ability to generate ideas and adapt innovatively to changing environments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C5. The ability to formulate and investigate problems, create solutions, innovate and improve current practices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C6. The abilities and skills that provide a foundation for future leadership roles. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D CRITICAL JUDGEMENT |
| D2. The ability to apply critical reasoning to issues through independent thought and informed judgement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D4. The ability to process material and to critically analyse and integrate information from a wide range of sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D5. The ability to evaluate opinions, make decisions and to reflect critically on the justifications for decisions using an evidence-based approach. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E ETHICAL AND SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING |
| E1. An understanding of social and civic responsibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E3. An appreciation of the philosophical and social contexts of a discipline. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E4. A knowledge and respect of ethics and ethical standards in relation to a major area of study. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E5. A knowledge of other cultures and times and an appreciation of cultural diversity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E7. The ability to work effectively and sensitively across all areas of society. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E8. An understanding of and respect for the roles and expertise of associated disciplines. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successfully completing this course will contribute to the recognition of your attainment of the following Engineers Australia graduate attributes:
| |
Learning Objectives |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Graduate Attributes |
| 1. Ability to apply knowledge of basic science and engineering fundamentals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. Ability to communicate effectively, not only with engineers, but also with the community at large |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. In-depth technical competence in at least one engineering discipline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Ability to undertake problem identification, formulation and solution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. Ability to utilise a systems approach to design and operational performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6. Ability to function effectively as an individual and in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams, with the capacity to be a team leader or manager as well as an effective team member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7. Understanding of the social, cultural, global and environmental responsibilities of the professional engineer, and for the need for sustainable development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8. Understanding of the principles of sustainable design and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9. Understanding of and commitment to professional and ethical responsibilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10. Expectation and capacity to undertake life-long learning |
|
|
|
|
|
|